Nearly Every Fed Govt Agency Routinely Plots & Carries out False Flag Operations

www.naturalnews.com

(NaturalNews) Yesterday I posted an article asking for American citizens to send me water samples from the Animas River that the EPA has now heavily contaminated with toxic heavy metals. I want to test the water in my elemental analysis laboratory to expose the EPA’s pollution.

The EPA used to prevent corporations from polluting the rivers, but now the EPA has become the polluter, the liar and the cover-up cartel. In that story, I pointed out the total absurdity of our sickening, corrupt government, where private citizens now have to conduct the science to expose the pollution of the EPA.

That got me thinking… hey, wait a minute. Almost EVERY federal government agency is now functioning as a rogue entity. Nearly all of them routinely carry out false flag events in order to justify their own existence (and increase their budgets).

In a very real way, U.S. government agencies have become mafia-style cartels carrying out domestic terrorism across America in order to justify their own existence.

Consider these extraordinary examples, and when you’re done, buy the book Battlefield America by John Whitehead. Or read his extraordinary essay entitled, “Don’t Be Fooled by the Political Game: The Illusion of Freedom in America.” It says everything you really need to know about the total con game racket being run on the American people by a corrupt, criminal government gone rogue.

Consider how the following government agencies carry out false flag attacks against America:

EPA intentionally pollutes Animas river to demand more funding

From Geologist predicted EPA would intentionally pollute Animas River to secure federal funding:

A July 30 letter to the editor of a local newspaper from a retired geologist appears to have predicted the Environmental Protection Agency’s disastrous chemical spill into a major Colorado River tributary that happened just days later.

…days before the incident, retired geologist Dave Taylor wrote to the editors of the Silverton Standard & the Miner newspaper that he believed there would be an intentional breach with ulterior motives behind it.

“Based on my 47 years of experience as a professional geologist,” Taylor wrote, “it appears to me that the EPA is setting your town and the area up for a possible Superfund blitzkrieg.”

FBI stages domestic terrorism events to “catch” the patsies they recruit

From FBI halts terror plot dreamed up by the FBI, then claims victory against terrorism:

According to NBC News, FBI agents have arrested an Ohio man who allegedly was attempting to set up an ISIS cell in the United States and planning an attack against the U.S. Capitol Building. However, U.S. officials also told NBC News that there was never any danger because the government set up the whole thing.

CDC invents fake pandemics to spread fear and create demand for vaccines

From Expert who massively exaggerated Ebola outbreak predictions under fire on claims (Daily Mail)

Meltzer has a lot of critics who say he and his CDC colleagues have a habit of willfully ignoring the complexities of disease outbreaks, resulting in estimates that over-dramatize how bad an outbreak could get – estimates that may be skewed by politics. They say Meltzer and company also overestimate how much vaccine is needed and how beneficial it has been.

The CDC, working in obvious conspiracy with vaccine manufacturers, routinely overestimates pandemics for the express purpose of creating fear. Many observers have even stated the likelihood that the CDC could have intentionally spread measles in Disneyland, followed by an orchestrated (and outrageous) national media fear campaign to push for mandatory vaccines.

DOJ runs guns into Mexico to generate gun violence and call for more gun control

How can we all forget Operation Fast and Furious? From Fast and Furious scandal blown wide open by Univision:

In a bombshell investigative report broadcast Sunday, one filled with scathing details and grim, grisly video including security-cam footage of actual execution-style murders and blood-soaked rooms (there’s your warning, for those of you who might be a little unnerved by that kind of real-life graphic violence), the network said it discovered that in January 2010, drug cartel hit men annihilated students with guns the U.S. government allowed to flow to them across the border into Mexico.

Essentially, the DOJ (under Eric Holder) openly allowed guns to fall into the hands of drug cartels, hoping those guns would be used in a wave of violence that could be invoked to call for nationwide gun bans.

FDA refuses to ban dangerous drugs, ensuring widespread medical injuries that sell more medications

For its false flag, the FDA routinely allows dangerous drugs like Vioxx and Rezulin to remain on the market long after the dangers to patients are well documented, knowing that they will cause severe biological damage to medical patients.

This damage, in turn, results in yet more medications being sold to “treat” the symptoms caused by the first drugs.

Rezulin, for example, causes liver damage. Chemotherapy causes permanent brain and kidney damage, leading to recurring sales of dialysis services and dementia drugs.

Antidepressant drugs cause diabetes, and once a patient has diabetes, they are prescribed more drugs to control blood sugar. This, in turn, often leads to obesity, heart disease and a long list of other symptoms which are also treated with drugs.

The FDA, by the way, receives tens of millions of dollars in year in funding directly from drug companies.

ATF staged the Waco massacre to win budget increases to fight “radical extremism”

If you don’t yet know that the ATF staged the David Koresh Waco raid in order to justify its own budget increases, you need to study up on real history.

Everything about the Waco “compound” (i.e. a campus) and David Koresh was a fabrication by federal agents. All the claims of child abuse, for example, were utterly fabricated by the feds in order to justify an armed raid on private property. It was called a “compound” by the lamestream media because the term “compound” sounds more militaristic than “building” or “campus.”

Read The Holocaust at Waco by Gary Null, or read this description of the Waco massacre.

DEA runs the drug trade in America

I’m not even going to bother explaining this section in much detail. If you don’t yet know that the DEA runs and controls the illicit drug trade in America, you’re so far out of the loop on reality that you’ll probably never wake up.

The entire “War on Drugs” was designed from the very start to keep the DEA in power — to create a cartel-like enforcement monopoly so that government agents could control the flow and distribution of illicit drugs while profiting from that trade.

Read CONFIRMED: The DEA Struck A Deal With Mexico’s Most Notorious Drug Cartel” (Business Insider) which says:

An investigation by El Universal found that between the years 2000 and 2012, the U.S. government had an arrangement with Mexico’s Sinaloa drug cartel that allowed the organization to smuggle billions of dollars of drugs while Sinaloa provided information on rival cartels.

Similarly, New American reports U.S. Government and Top Mexican Drug Cartel Exposed as Partners:

For over a decade, under multiple administrations, the U.S. government had a secret agreement with the ruthless Mexican Sinaloa drug cartel that allowed it to operate with impunity, an in-depth investigation by a leading Mexican newspaper confirmed this week. In exchange for information and assistance in quashing competing criminal syndicates, the Bush and Obama administrations let the Sinaloa cartel import tons of drugs into the United States while wiping out Sinaloa competitors and ensuring that its leaders would not be prosecuted for their long list of major crimes. Other revelations also point strongly to massive but clandestine U.S. government involvement in drug trafficking.

When will Americans wake up and realize their government is already at WAR against them?

How long will it take for Americans to wake up and realize the federal government is actively waging warfare and domestic terrorism against the American people?

I can’t recommend this book strongly enough: BUY and READ Battlefield America by John W. Whitehead (with a foreward by Ron Paul).

This book will forever change your understanding of the real world and how the federal government now behaves exactly like a criminal regime waging a war against the People of this nation.

Feds Often Create Terror Threats, Study Finds

 thenewamerican.com

The U.S. government often manufactures and creates the alleged “terrorism threats” it purports to be fighting, in some cases even prodding mentally challenged dupes into bogus “plots” that authorities concocted in the first place, according to a newly released report highlighting the troubling practices. Perhaps the most outrageous finding: Almost every high-profile domestic terror case across America since the September 11 attacks featured the “direct involvement” of government agents or informants. In some cases, virtually the entire “terrorism” plot — from start to finish — was actually led and financed by government operatives.

Also alarming, the investigation found, are routine violations of constitutionally protected rights such as due process and fair treatment amid the never-ending and increasingly domestic-oriented terror war. From the use of “secret evidence” and anonymous juries to schemes that border on “entrapment,” the report suggests that U.S. terror policies are officially out of control. The authors of the report said the controversial tactics may even be putting national security at risk by diverting law enforcement and other resources from real threats.

The 214-page report, dubbed “Illusion of Justice: Human Rights Abuses in US Terrorism Prosecutions,” focused specifically on more than two dozen federal terror cases. As part of the probe, the non-profit Human Rights Watch and Columbia Law School’s Human Rights Institute examined all elements of the 27 cases, from initiation of the federal investigations to eventual sentencing and even the conditions of confinement after conviction. Their findings, unveiled last week, paint a troubling picture of the U.S. “terror” apparatus, its human-rights implications, and the direction in which it is all going.

The human rights-focused investigators found numerous concerns in all aspects of the process, including what they called “overly aggressive” sting operations and “unnecessarily restrictive” conditions in prison. Many of the examples highlighted in the report are truly shocking — even to the judges presiding over the cases. For example, in the “Newburgh Four” case, the judge slammed the government’s tactics, saying it “came up with the crime, provided the means, and removed all relevant obstacles.” Authorities made a terrorist out of a man “whose buffoonery is positively Shakespearean in scope,” the judge added in his stinging rebuke.

Since the September 11, 2001, attacks on U.S. soil, there have been some 500 terrorism-related cases in federal courts. “This is a number that sounds really big, and it makes it sound like Americans are being kept safe from terrorism attacks,” explained Andrea Prasow, deputy Washington director for Human Rights Watch. “But we found that in a lot of these cases, people were prosecuted who never would have committed a terrorist attack in the first place, if it weren’t for the involvement of the FBI.”

The New American has also documented more than a few similar cases in recent years. Among the myriad examples: Duping mentally ill Muslims into agreeing to help with fake government-orchestrated terror plots, providing fake “bombs” and convincing a group of young anarchists to plant them on a bridge, and countless more. In press releases announcing arrests and prosecutions, authorities regularly boast about the fact that the “terrorists” it arrests were actually prodded and led into the scheme by government agents and informants. Sometimes the dupes are even offered taxpayer money.

The latest report offers more evidence that the problem has become widespread. “Americans have been told that their government is keeping them safe by preventing and prosecuting terrorism inside the U.S.,” continued Prasow, who also served as one of the authors of the new report. “But take a closer look and you realize that many of these people would never have committed a crime if not for law enforcement encouraging, pressuring, and sometimes paying them to commit terrorist acts.”

Of the terror-related cases prosecuted since 9/11, the plurality of convictions came from so-called “material support” charges, the report found. Those normally stem from offering any sort of assistance, which can even include advice, to a proscribed organization or individual. Among the more outrageous examples highlighted in the human-rights investigation and subsequent news reports was a man initially accused of providing “military gear” to al-Qaeda. It turned out to be waterproof socks in his luggage.

Especially vulnerable, according to the human-rights report, are Muslims in the United States. The report suggests that the authorities have been burning bridges with the Islamic community in their zeal to uncover or invent terror plots; even employing troubling tactics such as paying mentally ill dupes to engage in fake terrorism schemes concocted by government officials from the start. Despite prohibitions on outright entrapment, the human-rights investigators also found that the legal burden of proving it means U.S. courts are often going along with the dubious tactics.

“The U.S. government should stop treating American Muslims as terrorists-in-waiting,” Prasow continued in a statement about the findings. “The bar on entrapment in U.S. law is so high that it’s almost impossible for a terrorism suspect to prove. Add that to law enforcement preying on the particularly vulnerable, such as those with mental or intellectual disabilities, and the very poor, and you have a recipe for rampant human rights abuses.”

As The New American magazine has documented, Muslims are not the only ones in the crosshairs. In fact, in recent years, the federal government has become increasingly brazen in labeling everyday Americans — veterans, conservatives, libertarians, pro-life activists, and more — as potential terror threats merely for their political views. Under the Obama administration, those trends have accelerated quickly, with numerous departments already exposed for officially painting a target on the backs of tens of millions of innocent Americans. Today, top U.S. officials openly admit to murdering “suspected militants” who have never been charged with a crime.

“Far from protecting Americans, including American Muslims, from the threat of terrorism, the policies documented in this report have diverted law enforcement from pursuing real threats,” Prasow added. “It is possible to protect people’s rights and also prosecute terrorists, which increases the chances of catching genuine criminals.” Other experts, including constitutional scholars, have documented similar problems with terror-war tactics.

The federal government, on the other hand, defended U.S. policies in response to the accusations in the report. “The Department of Justice has been a steadfast ally of our nation’s civil rights groups for decades,” DOJ spokesman Marc Raimondi was quoted as saying by the Washington Post. “The report itself acknowledges that the legal process used in the cases it highlighted is not only lawful but is also specifically approved by federal judges…. We do not and cannot target individuals solely for engaging in activities protected by the First Amendment, which includes free speech and religion.”

Assistant Director Michael Kortan with the FBI Office of Public Affairs claimed the Bureau’s use of informants and undercover agents was legal, important to keeping America “safe,” and already subject to what he called “rigorous oversight.” He also denied suggestions in the new report that the federal government was deploying infiltrators into communities without any evidence of wrongdoing. “The FBI does not target individuals or groups on the basis of race, ethnicity or religion and engages in outreach with diverse communities to combat all criminal activity, including terrorism,” Kortan said.

Among other recommendations, Human Rights Watch said the use of “informants” by the FBI should be restricted and subject to “robust” oversight. Prosecutors should also stop charging people with “material support to terrorism” based on activities “protected under freedom of expression principles,” it added. Finally, in response to troubling findings surrounding prison conditions, the report recommended ensuring “humane” conditions, including an end to subjecting prisoners to prolonged periods of solitary confinement.

Alex Newman is a correspondent for The New American, covering economics, education, politics, and more. He can be reached at anewman@thenewamerican.com. Follow him on Twitter @ALEXNEWMAN_JOU.

Related articles:

FBI Celebrates Duping Another Mentally Ill Man Into Fake Terror Plot

FBI Celebrates Foiling Its Own Terror Plot, Again

FBI Dupes May Day Anarchists into Bogus Terror Plot

“We Kill People Based on Metadata,” Admits Former CIA/NSA Boss

The FBI Imagines Crimes and Then Arrests the Criminals

Manufacturing Monsters to Mash

“Drug Lords” Targeted in Fast & Furious Worked for FBI

Obama’s Terrorist Ties and Radical Roots

Justice Department Trained Police to Link Political Activism With Terror

UN, Obama Fighting Alongside Al-Qaeda in Libya

Al-Qaeda & the West Back Syrian Rebels Against Assad

Bin Laden & Al-Qaeda: U.S. Govt. Creations